“Dr” Harald Gaier’s website ruled misleading by ASA

“Dr” Harald Gaier practises from a rented room on London’s Harley Street.
As one of their editorial panel, he also writes regularly for the controversial and misleading magazine What Doctors Don’t Tell You, where he is described as “arguably the UK’s most knowledgeable practitioner of the major alternative medical disciplines”.

The Advertising Standards Authority ruled today that Gaier must remove misleading and unsubstantiated claims from his website and must not imply that he is a medical doctor.

gaier

Image taken from Harald Gaier’s website earlier today

The complainant challenged whether:

1.  the ad misleadingly implied that the advertiser was a medical doctor rather than a practitioner specialising in complementary and alternative medicine;

2.  the claim “Scientifically proven medical alternative medicine, paired with orthodox diagnostic tests” was misleading and could be substantiated, because they did not believe that the treatments and diagnostic tests were either scientifically proven or orthodox; and

3.  the claims for the efficacy of the three diagnostic tests described by the advertiser were misleading and could be substantiated.

Rather than simply updating his website, Gaier contested the complaint:

1.  Dr Harald Gaier stated he had studied homoeopathic medicine in South Africa and was awarded the degree of “Doctor of Homoeopathic Medicine”.  Furthermore, he commented that he was registered with the S.A. Allied Health Professions Council and was also awarded the honorific title “doctor” in Austria.  Nevertheless, he stated that his website made it clear that he was not registered with the General Medical Council (GMC), but was however, on the General Osteopathic Council register.

2. & 3. Dr Harald Gaier stated that the Royal Society of Medicine initiated a series of conferences on medicine and complementary therapies.  He commented that the South African model for co-existence between orthodox and natural medicine were discussed and recorded in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, published in 1988.

Dr Harald Gaier further stated that the tests he used were conducted at registered laboratories, which used validated test procedures.

At the time of writing, he has still not amended his website.

According to What Doctors Don’t Tell You, Gaier is registered as an osteopath, homeopath, acupuncturist, naturopath and medical herbalist and was on the Research Committee of the Prince of Wales’ Foundation for Integrated Health as a naturopathic physician. They do not clarify that he is not registered with the GMC.

What Doctors Don’t Tell You has a history of publishing misleading adverts,  seemingly fails to understand the role of the ASA and even lends support to the misguided campaign, ASA-the-TRUTH.

It would not surprise me if Gaier were to soon join ASA-the-TRUTH’s founder, “Dr” Alyssa Burns-Hill, on the ASA’s list of non-compliant advertisers.

3 responses to ““Dr” Harald Gaier’s website ruled misleading by ASA

  1. Pingback: WDDTY: My Master List | Josephine Jones

  2. Sharon,

    Next time try writing your message in English. More people here might be able to understand you.

  3. According to the Diplomat magazine, most of Harley street is owned by the Walden Estate who rent it to people in the medical, both allopathic and Holistic. So what’s the gripe about Dr Gaier renting a room there? Since both HM Elisabeth 2 and her son, the future king, trust Homeopathy and have every specialist in the world available to them should they choose to use them, I hardly see why the Liberal Fascist get so worked up about Homeopathy. Most GPs admit that much of the effect of the allopathic medicine is based on the placebo effect, and many NHS doctors are also specialists in Homeopathy and Functional medicine.
    This comes across as just as another witch hunt against a reputable publication = WDDTY, by someone who clearly has their own agenda. I’m happy for the lady with cancer that the NHS treatment is helping her, but sadly, as Lord Saatchi discovered when his beloved wife of 30 years was dying of cancer because the NHS couldn’t help her, no other treatment was allowed even though there was circumstantial evidence it had helped others. This attitude of what is ‘ scientifically Correct or not’ reminds me of the Medieval Pope who sated ‘ that women who cure with herbs but have no book learning, must be in league with the devil. They should therefore be burnt as witches”! We don’t seeemd to have progressed very far since the 12th century.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s